Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1425

reference
936-tree-1
name
1425
tree-preservation-order

undefined

936-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.028573 50.877027)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.028531 50.877022,-1.028533 50.877031,-1.028539 50.877038,-1.028548 50.877044,-1.028560 50.877048,-1.028573 50.877050,-1.028586 50.877049,-1.028598 50.877045,-1.028608 50.877039,-1.028614 50.877031,-1.028616 50.877023,-1.028614 50.877015,-1.028608 50.877007,-1.028599 50.877001,-1.028587 50.876997,-1.028574 50.876996,-1.028561 50.876997,-1.028549 50.877001,-1.028539 50.877007,-1.028533 50.877014,-1.028531 50.877022)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL